A provision in the House proposed Environment Omnibus bill adds new requirements for legislative review of water quality rules. These provisions add new layers of bureaucracy and will delay and weaken the state’s ability to protect lakes and rivers from phosphorus, nitrates, and other pollution.
The Administrative Procedure Act already requires extensive peer review and cost analysis of water quality rules. The proposed bill would require an additional layer of analysis and review and would give the legislature veto power over proposed rules, injecting politics into the state’s ability to protect water quality.
This additional analysis and review is highly duplicative of the existing process and will cost the state over $12 million in the next two years.
An amendment to the bill eliminates the these new requirements and re-allocates the dollars to core environmental programs including forest management, parks and trails, and preventing the spread of aquatic invasive species (AIS).
What Would Happen?
The duplicative legislature review of water quality standards is rejected and dollars are re-allocated to forests, parks and trails, and AIS.
The provisions to require legislative review of water quality rules move forward, and programs for forests, parks and trails, and AIS receive less funding.
How The Committee Voted
The provisions to require legislative review of water quality rules move forward, and programs for forests, parks and trails, and AIS receive less funding.
Members At The Time Of The Vote
-
Karen Clark
District 62A
Vote: Yes -
Tony Cornish
District 23B
Vote: No -
David Dill
District 03A
Vote: No -
Dan Fabian
District 01A
Vote: No -
Kelly Fenton
District 53B
Vote: No -
Peter Fischer
District 43A
Vote: Yes -
Steve Green
District 02B
Vote: No -
Tom Hackbarth
District 31B
Vote: No -
David Hancock
District 02A
Vote: No -
Rick Hansen
District 52A
Vote: Yes -
Alice Hausman
District 66A
Vote: Yes -
Josh Heintzeman
District 10A
Vote: No -
Frank Hornstein
District 61A
Vote: Yes -
Clark Johnson
District 19A
Vote: Yes -
Jim Knoblach
District 14B
Vote: Absent -
Denny McNamara
District 54B
Vote: No -
Jim Newberger
District 15B
Vote: No -
John Persell
District 05A
Vote: Yes -
Jeanne Poppe
District 27B
Vote: Absent -
Jason Rarick
District 11B
Vote: No -
Paul Torkelson
District 16B
Vote: No -
Mark Uglem
District 36A
Vote: No